Demonetization
is the new buzz word and it is being used as a service to motherland or as the
greatest disservice to the nation, as per the political leaning of the person
using it. In 1969 when Mrs Gandhi took the bold step of nationalizing 16
private banks of India, there were political connatations to it as well a serious
economic reasoning. Similarly the step taken by Mr Prime Minister regarding the
declaration of 500 and 1000 rupees notes as no longer being legal tender needs
to be put in the right perspective. As soon as the Prime Minister addressed the
nation, all hell broke loose and before the common man could even get the whiff
of the magnanimity of the announcement, the cash registers of jewelers got
ringing as cash was transformed into bullion. Now how the gold shop owners will
show these transactions will be very interesting to observe. As analysis
started pouring in by buckets, most of them were in black or white depending on
the ideology one followed, sane, balanced analysis has been few and far
between. The opportunities and pitfalls that will be created by this decision
need to be put in proper perspective so that forecasts can be made regarding
the Indian economy. Here it needs to be mentioned that even the biggest critic
of the present govt has to appreciate the timing and the element of surprise,
now whether the real money stock holders were surprised, only time will tell.
There are a few
questions that are titillating me for the past one week. The first is that
whether this move will wipe off black money from the face of our country and my
answer is a big NO because black money is just not horded cash, it is much
bigger evil. Approximately about 3 % of the entire black money is in liquid form
and hoarding it is mostly done b corrupt bureaucrats, small traders, middlemen,
jewelers and the likes. 97% is still out of the govt net right now. When we
were classroom students of Economics, our Public Finance Prof would often say
that for every 1 rupee in white, there are 3 rupees in black. And who could
forget the famous or infamous quote of Mr Rajiv Gandhi that out of every rupee
spent by the govt, only 15 paisa reaches the beneficiary. Now the question is
whether the entire 85 paisa is hoarded or part of it gets parked offshore, gets
converted into bullion or in benami assets? We all know the answer to this, so
that settles the question of black money=block money.
Individually for
me the biggest question is how will govt inject back liquidity in the market?
Post 1991, emphasis has been on consumerism and EMI backed consumption has
become the norm. high GDP growth rate has been fueled by consumerism which is
based on money flow. The contribution of Tier II &III cities in this growth
rate has been their spending capacity which has quadrupled in the last two and
a half decades. Now when money stock has been targeted, consumption, at least
in the next quarter will be badly affected. Retailers have already started feeling
the pinch as in the past one week the sales has dipped by 60 to 75 %. In this
sector too it is the unroganised sector that is facing the worst time. Be it
the nukkad ki dukan, roadside food stalls, chaiwalas, the vegetable hawkers,
road side tailors and the likes. The situation will improve for sure but how
much and how soon is the question. So my contention remains the same, is how is
the government going to support the business of the small unroganised
businessmen? Quick estimates coming in from commerce bodies is the daily loss
in revenue is to the tune of 26000 cr, so we can all do the math and calculate
the loss.
Secondly in the
short run employment is lost, again more in the unorganized sector which
happens to be the largest recruiter. About 40 percent of the jobs are generated
by this sector and if money flow comes down, so will employment, especially in
the real estate market. Another labour related problem is the no of man-hours
lost in standing in queues for exchanging currency, but this may be overlooked
in the broader perspective if corruption and black money gets removed.
Thirdly why did
the government issue a larger denomination currency to replace the smaller
ones? Whenever demonetization takes place, government replaces the big
denominations by smaller denomination currency so as to curb hoarding. Moreover
there is actually replacement and not demonetization, as 500 and 1000 rupee
notes are being reintroduced, albeit in new colour and design. The cost benefit
analysis must have been done by the team of experts so that banks may earn some
extra revenue by printing new notes and distributing them. In 1978 when the
last demonetization took place, banks earned something to the tune of 28000
crores, I am hoping that this time too the banks earn as already the banks are
in bad shape and this will do them good.
Another problem
that has come up and I am sure the govt did not anticipate it is the debt trap
in which the tribal’s, poor people have fallen because of some sleazy work of
politicians. There has been national news that politicians in two states have
disbursed loans to them in old currency and obviously they will be repaid in
new currency, a smart way to convert black into white.
In this entire
quagmire, a very big positive that has come up is the correction that will take
place in the real estate market. Currently property in India is highly
overprices and most of the purchases are for the sake of investment and not for
living purpose. And in this entire process, the people who really want a roof
of their own, either get trapped in debts or it is beyond their means. I am
sure my friends from the real estate market won’t like my writing this but that
is the truth as I see it.
I have left out
the main actor of this entire Demonetization act, the Banks from my analysis as
it requires another write up for which I have to go back to my notes on BASEL
norms, cashless economy concepts, the indigenous moneylenders, agricultural
sector and many more. Looking forward to reading these things again with a new
perspective.